Turn complex questions about contracts, cases, deals, or portfolios into a defensible answer. Xybern explores multiple lines of reasoning, reconciles conflicts, and surfaces a clear conclusion with sources, lineage, and a consensus signal.
Representative internal evals (self-verify on, paths=4).
Held-out; exact-match
Lower is better
Claims with citations
Mean agreement
For clear, well-framed questions, a single line of reasoning gives you a fast, focused answer. It’s ideal for day-to-day reviews, quick checks, and follow-ups where the guardrails are already known.
Xybern generates independent lines of analysis, lets them critique each other, and then reconciles the results. The outcome is a clear recommendation for your matter or scenario, with visible consensus and complete citations.
Representative coverage for reasoning quality, citation faithfulness, and conflict handling across legal and finance workloads.
What breaks single-path analysis in high-stakes legal and financial work gets surfaced and corrected in multi-path.
Parallel paths force premises into the open, so contradictions don’t hide behind a single story.
Independent evidence sets reduce selective quoting and keep the answer anchored to what’s actually in the record.
A consensus score reflects agreement across paths, not just how long or polished the answer sounds.
Bring a real matter: a contract, case, regulatory question, or portfolio scenario. Watch Xybern explore divergent paths, self-verify, and converge on a cited, consensus-backed answer.
“In high-stakes work, a conclusion is only as strong as the challenge it survives.”
